Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Blog Article

However, the above observation is without prejudice into the legal rights from the parties, arising out with the over marriage with the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of regulation. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears along with a new system is set in its place.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of the boy or Woman usually do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they might Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.

For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal has not yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. While in the meantime police shall remain neutral from the private dispute between the parties, however, if any on the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall get prompt action against them under law. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it is actually rather obscure about whether the 90-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the 90-day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

Because of this, simply citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Consider it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-this sort of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving across the neighborhood trying to find their phone is likely to be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a effectively-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

The regulation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the check here police to become scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the few had two young children of their have at home, the social worker didn't tell them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair experienced younger children.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

The learned Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced because of the findings while in the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more